The client browses and selects photos, but the originals stay with you. Every preview carries a watermark with the client's name, so a screenshot is useless.
Tiles cover the whole frame, not a corner. Picvelo puts your client's name into them, for example "Kate and Tom, proof", and burns it into the preview file. A screenshot comes out marked, so it is no good for Instagram or for print.
In the proofing gallery the client only sees previews. Source files are available exclusively to you, after logging in to your panel. You hand over the originals only when you decide to, in a separate delivery gallery.
You see what happens with the gallery, and sensitive data never leaks from the files.
Yes. No website can block screenshots and we will not pretend otherwise. That is why we make the screenshot worthless: the preview carries a watermark with the client's name and is good for remembering a frame at best, not for publishing or printing.
Not from the proofing gallery. There the client only sees watermarked previews. You hand over the final photos separately, through a delivery gallery, once you choose to share it.
No. Previews are regenerated from the original, so EXIF metadata, including GPS coordinates of the session location, never make it into the files the client sees.
Previews without a watermark stop being public. We serve them only after login, so someone with just a file link will see nothing.